Human In Vitro Retina, number 2

part of Experiments by aegrumet@alum.mit.edu

Summary

  1. On November 9, 1999 a series of in vitro measurements were made on a sample of living human retina, taken from the eye of a patient with cancer of the eye socket. The patient's eye was removed as part of the cancer treatment.
  2. Excitation thresholds were measured for several cells. Monopolar thresholds ranged from roughly 0.1-0.4 microamps for a 400 microsecond per phasic anodic first balanced biphasic pulse pair with 400 microseconds intraphase delay, consistent with previous experiments in rabbit.
  3. Partial maps were made of 2 cells (no complete maps from which a reliable estimate of the fiber location could be made).
  4. A few bipolar threshold measurements were made on 1 cell. Thresholds were somewhat higher for stimulation across the fiber than for stimulation along the fiber, as in rabbits.
  5. Exposure to 5min bright illumination did not cause any change in threshold.
  6. Addition of 200uM cadmium largely eliminated the spontaneous activity, but caused no change in threshold. The retina did not respond at all to light pre-cadmium, probably due to bleaching during the dissection which was performed under very bright illumination. Since there was no light response there was no independent means of judging cadmium efficacy, but the abrupt disappearance of spontaneous activity clearly indicates that the cadmium did something.
  7. I did not find any single unit responses upon switching the positions of stimulating and recording electrodes. Pre-cadmium, did observe highly variable "late" activity for the highest currents tested (2-2.4uA) in the 3-20ms interval following the stimulus (Quantifying this activity may be challenging). Post-cadmium, found late activity only in the 3-8ms interval under the same conditions.

Timeline

Monopolar Thresholds

Monopolar thresholds were measured for several cells at just one stimulating electrode position:

Recording Electrode Stimulating Electrode Threshold (microamps)
F5 D4 .34
B6 C1 .2
A4 C6 .3
E1 G1 .19

Partial monopolar threshold maps were made for two cells as shown in the tables below. Thresholds are listed in microamperes. Note that two values are listed in boxes corresponding to stimulating electrode positions where a second threshold measurement was made as a control. -- = threshold was not determined.

Recording Electrode: A2
XX -- -- -- -- XX
.21
.21
>.40 -- -- -- --
.19 .27
.30
.32 -- -- --
.29 .22 -- -- -- --
.28 .19 -- -- -- --
XX .21 -- -- -- XX
Recording Electrode: F5
XX -- -- -- -- XX
-- -- -- -- -- --
-- .19 .29 -- -- --
-- .29 .18 -- -- --
-- -- .16 -- -- --
XX -- .18 -- -- XX

A strength-duration curve was measured for the cell picked up by recording electrode A2. Stimuli were symmetric, charge-balanced, anodic-first stimuli with phase durations listed and an intra-phase delay of 400 microseconds.

Phase Duration (microseconds) Threshold (microamperes)
50 .93
100 .53
200 .35
400 .25
800 .20
1600 .20

The effects of bright light and cadmium on threshold were measured for the cell picked up by recording electrode F5. In all these measurements the stimulus was monopolar, applied between stimulating electrode H1 (see below) and a distant return.

Bipolar Thresholds

It is easiest to describe how the bipolar threshold measurements were made by assigning names to each of the stimulating electrodes. Here is the naming convention:

XX G6 G4 C2 C0 XX
G0 G7 G5 C1 C7 C6
G2 G1 G3 C3 C5 C4
H4 H5 H3 D1 D3 D2
H6 H7 H1 D5 D7 D0
XX H0 H2 D4 D6 XX

Here are the thresholds, measured for the cell picked up by recording electrode A2 (see partial monopolar threshold map above):

Simulator + Terminal Stimulator - Terminal Type of Stimulation Threshold (microamps)
G0 ground Monopolar .21
G0 H4 Along .24
G0 G5 Across .29
       
H6 ground Monopolar .27
H6 H1 Across .33
       
G2 ground Monopolar .19
G2 H6 Along .21
G2 G3 Across .26


aegrumet@alum.mit.edu