Human In Vitro Retina, number 2
part of
Experiments
by aegrumet@alum.mit.edu
Summary
- On November 9, 1999 a series of in vitro measurements were made on a sample
of living human retina, taken from the eye of a patient with cancer of the
eye socket. The patient's eye was removed as part of the cancer treatment.
- Excitation thresholds were measured for several cells.
Monopolar thresholds ranged from roughly 0.1-0.4 microamps for a
400 microsecond per phasic anodic first balanced biphasic pulse pair with
400 microseconds intraphase delay,
consistent with previous experiments in rabbit.
- Partial maps were made of 2 cells (no complete maps from which a
reliable estimate of the fiber location could be made).
- A few bipolar threshold measurements were made on 1 cell. Thresholds were
somewhat higher for stimulation across the fiber than for
stimulation along the fiber, as in rabbits.
- Exposure to 5min bright illumination did not cause any change in
threshold.
- Addition of 200uM cadmium largely eliminated the spontaneous activity,
but caused no change in threshold. The retina did not respond at
all to light pre-cadmium, probably due to bleaching during the dissection
which was performed under very bright illumination.
Since there was no light response there was no independent means of
judging cadmium efficacy, but the abrupt disappearance of spontaneous
activity clearly indicates that the cadmium did something.
- I did not find any single unit responses upon switching the positions
of stimulating and recording electrodes. Pre-cadmium,
did observe highly variable "late" activity for the highest currents
tested (2-2.4uA) in the 3-20ms interval following the stimulus (Quantifying
this activity may be challenging). Post-cadmium, found late activity
only in the 3-8ms interval under the same conditions.
Timeline
- 3:25pm:Eye is removed from the body at the Mass. Eye and Ear
Infirmary.
- 3:45pm:Eye arrives at MIT. Dissection is performed under bright
illumination.
- 4:35pm:A patch of retina, taken from the same area where in vivo
stimulation took place, is mounted on the array and recording commences.
The unused portions of retina are stored in Ames' medium and placed in a
cold water bath.
- 4:45-4:55pm:Spontaneous activity is evident. Recorded spikes
resemble those seen in rabbit, though are a bit small (about 50microvolts) in
amplitude.
- 5-6pm:Trying to electrically stimulate the retina without success.
A possible cause is that the retina patch is not aligned correctly on the
array. Ideally the axons should run vertically. It is possible that we
lost track of the axon direction during disssection.
- 6-6:30pm:The retina patch is removed from the array and set
aside in a petri dish with Ames' medium.
- 6:30pm:A new patch of retina, from which the axon direction could
be more readily deduced but from an area that was not used for in vivo
stimulation, is mounted on the array. Vigorous spontaneous activity is
observered immediately with large spike amplitudes.(hundreds of microvolts)
- 6:55pm-12:15am:Thresholds for electric stimulation are measured.
- 12:15am-1:30am:Retina samples are placed in paraformaldehyde, with
the first patch (from the region where in vivo stimulation was applied)
in a separate container. Cleanup.
Monopolar Thresholds
Monopolar thresholds were measured for several cells at
just one stimulating electrode position:
Recording Electrode |
Stimulating Electrode |
Threshold (microamps) |
F5 |
D4 |
.34 |
B6 |
C1 |
.2 |
A4 |
C6 |
.3 |
E1 |
G1 |
.19 |
Partial monopolar threshold maps were made for two cells as shown
in the tables below. Thresholds are listed in microamperes.
Note that two values are listed in boxes corresponding to stimulating electrode
positions where a second threshold measurement was made as a
control. -- = threshold was not determined.
Recording Electrode: A2 |
XX |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
XX |
.21 .21 |
>.40 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
.19 |
.27 .30 |
.32 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
.29 |
.22 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
.28 |
.19 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
XX |
.21 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
XX |
|
Recording Electrode: F5 |
XX |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
XX |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
.19 |
.29 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
.29 |
.18 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
.16 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
XX |
-- |
.18 |
-- |
-- |
XX |
|
A strength-duration curve was measured for the cell picked up
by recording electrode A2. Stimuli were symmetric, charge-balanced,
anodic-first stimuli with phase durations listed and an
intra-phase delay of 400 microseconds.
Phase Duration (microseconds) |
Threshold (microamperes) |
50 |
.93 |
100 |
.53 |
200 |
.35 |
400 |
.25 |
800 |
.20 |
1600 |
.20 |
The effects of bright light and cadmium on threshold were measured
for the cell picked up by recording electrode F5.
In all these measurements the stimulus was monopolar, applied between
stimulating electrode H1 (see below) and a distant return.
- Threshold prior to 5 minutes illumination with the room lights on
(they were normally dim) and a flashlight pointed directly at the
preparation: .156 microamps
- Threshold after 5 minutes illumination: .154 microamps
- Threshold prior to application of 200 micromolar cadmium
chloride (CdCl2): .154 microamps
- Threshold after 10 minutes in cadmium, during which spontaneous
activity largely disappeared: .156 microamps
Bipolar Thresholds
It is easiest to describe how the bipolar threshold measurements
were made by assigning names to each of the stimulating electrodes.
Here is the naming convention:
XX |
G6 |
G4 |
C2 |
C0 |
XX |
G0 |
G7 |
G5 |
C1 |
C7 |
C6 |
G2 |
G1 |
G3 |
C3 |
C5 |
C4 |
H4 |
H5 |
H3 |
D1 |
D3 |
D2 |
H6 |
H7 |
H1 |
D5 |
D7 |
D0 |
XX |
H0 |
H2 |
D4 |
D6 |
XX |
Here are the thresholds, measured for the cell picked up by recording
electrode A2 (see partial monopolar threshold map above):
Simulator + Terminal |
Stimulator - Terminal |
Type of Stimulation |
Threshold (microamps) |
G0 |
ground |
Monopolar |
.21 |
G0 |
H4 |
Along |
.24 |
G0 |
G5 |
Across |
.29 |
|
|
|
|
H6 |
ground |
Monopolar |
.27 |
H6 |
H1 |
Across |
.33 |
|
|
|
|
G2 |
ground |
Monopolar |
.19 |
G2 |
H6 |
Along |
.21 |
G2 |
G3 |
Across |
.26 |
aegrumet@alum.mit.edu